BruceJoffe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MySitePlan Lawsuit #39661
    BruceJoffe
    Participant

    Joseph,
    Please send me your direct contact info.
    Bruce.Joffe [at] gmail

    Thanks

    in reply to: MySitePlan Lawsuit #39658
    BruceJoffe
    Participant

    Thank you, Joseph Elfelt, for your research and the informative links. Can you provide more detail on how the judge came to that conclusion in your case? “holding that my work does not fall within the statutory definition of land surveying”

    While the Building Code law you cited would appear to close the case against Ryan Crownholm, I’ll repeat something I wrote earlier in this blog:
    GIS managers in two public agencies attest that the requested site plan sketches are simply the preliminary step to issuing a building permit. Subsequently, the government agency may require detailed engineering drawings or certified survey products when necessary. Potentially encroaching decisions are not made from site plan sketches or diagrams.

    in reply to: UAS Data Retention – nomenclature discussion #188
    BruceJoffe
    Participant

    Dave, by “safe use” do you mean avoiding hazards caused by the flying machines? In this case, it doesn’t matter whether the UAS is used for data collection or any other purpose. The safe use requirements would be the same, and FAA restrictions govern flying aircraft safety. AB 56 and SB142 seek to regulate acquisition, use and retention of the data after they have been collected.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)